AboutNeuron TypesElectrophysiology PropertiesArticlesFAQsData/APIGet Involved

Article: Synaptic contributions to focal and widespread spatiotemporal dynamics in the isolated rat subiculum in vitro.

Full Text (publisher's website) ; Article Metadata ; Article Data (extracted)
Menendez de la Prida L; Gal B
J. Neurosci., 2004


Table 2.

Conductance changes associated with focal field activity

IB+ IB− RS FS
Resting conductance, Grest (nS) 9.4 ± 2.1 8.8 ± 3.2 5.5 ± 3.9a 2.4 ± 1.1b
Maximum conductance changes, Gsynp (nS) 19.5 ± 11.1 22.9 ± 14.7 10.9 ± 6.7c 8.6 ± 2.6c
Maximum conductance peak, ΔGpeak (%) 141 ± 85 110 ± 82 118 ± 62 408 ± 124d
Conductance at Vrev depolarized peak (%) 71 ± 29 69 ± 41 68 ± 11 412 ± 143e
Number 4 4 4 5
  • Data are given as means ± SD.

  • a Resting conductance: RS versus IB+ and IB−, statistically different at p < 0.05.

  • b Resting conductance: FS versus other cell types, statistically different at p < 0.005.

  • c Gsynp: RS and FS versus IB+ and IB−, both at p < 0.05.

  • d ΔGpeak: FS versus other cell types, p < 0.005.

  • e Conductance at Vrev depolarized peak: FS versus other cell types, p < 0.001.


Report miscurated data

Inferred neuron-electrophysiology data values

Neuron Type Neuron Description Ephys Prop Extracted Value Standardized Value Content Source