AboutNeuron TypesElectrophysiology PropertiesArticlesFAQsData/APIGet Involved

Article: Developmental Profile of Ion Channel Specializations in the Avian Nucleus Magnocellularis.

Full Text (publisher's website) ; Article Metadata ; Article Data (extracted)
Hong H; Rollman L; Feinstein B; Sanchez JT
Front Cell Neurosci, 2016


Change in potassium channel properties with different blockers.

E10–E12 E14–E16 E19–E21 ANOVA P
Percentage change in Kv current (Ik) with bath application of Flx (%)
Ik reduction at -50 mV 19.74 ± 23.03 (10) 22.55 ± 16.65 (11) 38.46 ± 20.96 (10) P = 0.11 (Figure 7G)
Ik reduction at -10 mV 66.64 ± 18.40 (10) 38.81 ± 15.37 (11) 42.66 ± 18.48 (10) P < 0.01 (Figure 7F)
Ik reduction at +20 mV 84.56 ± 11.35 (10) 63.88 ± 11.10 (11) 50.84 ± 16.80 (10) P < 0.001 (Figure 7E)
Percentage change in action potential (AP) properties with bath application of TEA* (%)
AP half width increase 178.90 ± 143.30 (9) 67.27 ± 22.53 (12) 45.41 ± 39.40 (20) P < 0.0001 (Figure 9B)
Max fall rate reduction 66.73 ± 10.69 (9) 46.51 ± 10.92 (12) 37.98 ± 17.08 (20) P < 0.001 (Figure 9C)
Threshold current reduction 41.41 ± 24.45 (9) 33.68 ± 10.01 (12) 21.97 ± 11.49 (20) P < 0.01 (Figure 9D)

Flx, Fluoxetine (100 μM), Kv3.1-containing KHVA+ channel blocker. TEA*, Tetraethylammonium (1 mM), Kv3.1–3.4 blocker.


Report miscurated data

Inferred neuron-electrophysiology data values

Neuron Type Neuron Description Ephys Prop Extracted Value Standardized Value Content Source